Changes
Bows
,/* Archery in warfare */
{{Stars2|Category = Missiles}}
{{Archery}}
==Self-bows==
Bows in the Viking Age were made from a single piece of ‘D’ section wood, usually yew if available [HALPIN Halpin 2008: p.40-41] (Dublin, Hedeby, Wassenaar), but elm (Dublin, Hedeby) and even scots pine (Dublin) were also used. Bow varied in strength up to around 100lbs (Hedeby). <br>
Bows were made by working down a wooden stave so that the heartwood formed the bulk of the bow, giving it its strength, while a layer of sapwood was retained along the bow’s back to give the bow more elasticity under tension and to help prevent it from breaking. <br>
Many of the bows were extremely simple and we have a number of finds of bows that still have the bumps and branch accretions left from the removed branches along their backs (Wassenaar, Hedeby). <br>
<!--{| classgallery mode="wikitable"|+ alignPacked heights="top" 130px style="captionPadding-sideleft: top30px; text-align: left;" | Recreation Guide>|Archery -parts of the bow (Gav).jpg| scope="col" width="80" style="text-align: center;"| [[Recreation Guide|800-899]]Parts of the bow| scope="col" width="80" style="text-align: center;"| [[Recreation Guide|900-979]]</gallery>| scope="col" width="80" style="text-align: center;"| [[Recreation Guide|980-1040]]| scopeBow Grips="col" width="80" style="text-align: center;"| [[Recreation Guide|1041-1100]]|None of the bows found in the Viking Age have any distinct swelling around the area of the handgrip or show any evidence of having a separate handgrip attached. The bow-| colspan="4" style="text-align: center;"| [[Recreation Guide|Optional]]|}--> staves run roughly parallel along their entire length. The only unique finds of bows that do have a distinct handgrip come from the C7th Alemannic graves at Oberflacht in southern Germany.
=== ... with deflexed nocks =Nocks of different material====''A deflexed nock is where the nock is deliberately strongly angled towards the string.''<br>'''Art'''<br>* [[T-M#T64|T64]] BL Harley f.64r<br>* [[T-M#T84|T84]] Vatican Reg.12 f.24v<br>'''Archaeology'''<br>--<br>'''Discussion'''<br>Almost all of the AngloIt appears that nocks with horn inserts or separately attached horn nocks were not used on self-Saxon manuscripts show bows with nocks deflexed away from in the archer, the complete reverse of the deflexed nocks found in archaeologyViking Age period. <br><br>Mary Rose?
== Bow Strings ==Stringing nocks and string keepers===='''Archaeology'''<br>* Wincott Heckett has suggested that Some bows have either a tabletsecondary set of nocks at one end of the bow-woven tubular silk cordstave (Dublin, dated to mid C12th, from Waterford may be ) or alternatively a bowstring. hole has been drilled through the terminal (Adare Castle) [HALPIN Halpin 2008: p.6159-60] Halpin then quotes Soar who suggests that .The secondary set of nocks, known as ‘stringing nocks’ helped in stringing the most common material for bow strings was hemp.<><>* York, EnglandThe hole drilled through the terminal was probably a ‘string keeper‘. A lump loop of beeswax with a groove caused by rubbing against a thread twine or string. Walton-Rogers comments that beeswax leather thong was often used on passed through the hole and the bow strings [WALTON ROGERS 1997: pstring with the intention of stopping the bow string from slipping down the bow-stave when unstrung.1785]'''Discussion'''<brgallery mode=Packed heights=250px style="Padding-left:30px; text-align:left;">Archery --String keeper (Stuttgart Psalter f.21r).jpg|String keeper<br>(Stuttgart Psalter f.21r)</gallery>
== See Also =Deflexed and reflexed terminals===We also have evidence for some bows having deliberately bent terminals after the nock points. These bent terminals either pointed towards the shooter (Dublin, Hedeby) or pointed away from the shooter (various manuscripts). Bows with terminals that bend towards the shooter, otherwise known as ‘deflexed’, are considered to be a diagnostic characteristic of a ‘Viking’ bow. These bent terminals were purely decorative and did not affect the ability of the bow in any way [Halpin 2008: p.???]. <br><gallery mode=Packed heights=250px style="Padding-left:30px; text-align:left;">Archery - Nock Deflexed (Pierpoint-Morgan Lib. M. 736 f.14).jpg|Bow with terminals that point towards the shooter (deflexed).<br>(Pierpoint-Morgan Lib. M. 736 fol.14, AD 1130)London, British Library MS Cotton Claudius B IV fol.41v.jpg|Bow with terminals that point away from the shooter (reflexed).<br>(Brit. Lib. Cott. Clau. B IV, AD 1040) </gallery>Almost all of the Anglo-Saxon manuscripts show bows with nocks bent away from the archer (reflexed), the complete reverse of the deflexed nocks found in archaeology.<br>Many of the bows found in Hedeby have the 'Viking' style of nock that are bent towards the archer (deflexed), along with the Ballinderry bow from Ireland. Paulsen [Catalogue Paulsen 1999] makes the case that this is “caused by shrinkage of the soft sapwood in the front”, a theory that is rejected by Halpin [Halpin 2008: p.61] who cites a number of authors including Hardy who makes the comment that the bows from the Mary Rose were also re-curved and “that no process during the lifetime of the bows, or after deposition, are convincing explanations for this feature”.<br> === Bow finds]Strings ===These were probably made from hemp, linen or silk. The evidence seems to point at hemp being the most commonly used material (Halpin 2008, p.61). Bow strings were usually 3 to 4mm thick and made from 3 ply twine (Altdorf, Switzerland [Hoernig 2005: p.110])<br>Wincott Heckett has suggested that a tablet-woven tubular silk cord, dated to mid C12th, from Waterford may be a bowstring. [Halpin 2008: p.61] Halpin then quotes Soar who suggests that the most common material for bow strings was hemp. In York, England, a lump of beeswax was found with a groove possibly caused by rubbing against a thread or string. Walton-Rogers comments that beeswax was often used on bow strings [Walton Rogers 1997: p.1785] ==Using the Bow=====Loosing arrows===During the Viking Age there were two methods employed for loosing arrows. The ‘Mediterranean loose’, which went on to dominate during the Middle Ages and the ‘Primary loose’, which w<><>. Arrows seem to have been drawn to the chest and not to the chin as is traditionally taught in modern longbow shooting. ===Archeryin warfare===Using archery in warfare appears to have been common in mainland Europe but probably not in Britain or Scandinavia. Why this was so is difficult to understand. Bows were used to both attack and defend fortifications but not apparently in direct combat. <br>In Charlemagne’s armies it became an essential weapon: ‘lanceam, scutum et arcum cum duas cordas, sagittas duodecim’ Capitulary of Aachen of 802/3, c 9. This instruction is most likely the result of the Carolingian wars against the Avars who we know from grave finds used composite bows with bone lathes [Manley 1985: p.226]]. <br>We have evidence from manuscripts that in battle archery was often performed by two men working together, one firing while the other supplied arrows.<gallery mode=Packed heights=250px style="Padding-left:30px; text-align:left;">Archery - Paired (Harley Psalter f.6r).jpg|Archery in pairs (Harley Psalter f.6r)Archery - Paired (Harley Psalter f.7r).jpg|Archery in pairs (Harley Psalter f.7r)</gallery> ===Poison===Battle of Maldon ‘poisoned point’ & ‘bows were busy’ [Manley 1985: p.225] ===Horse Archery===It appears that archery was not performed in Britain from horseback but it might have been done in France and the rest of mainland Europe. Byzantium warriors were known to ride backwards while shooting [Nicolle 1984]. <gallery mode=Packed heights=250px style="Padding-left:30px; text-align:left;">Archery - Horse (Stuttgart Psalter f.7v).jpg|Horse archers riding backwards<br>(Stuttgart Psalter f.7v)Archery - Horse (Harley Psalter f.25r).jpg|(Harley Psalter f.25r)</gallery>
== References ==
<HarvardReferences />